Penerapan pidana dalam penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 25/PUU-XIV/2016

Tri Mahardi, Yanto Yanto

Abstract


This research is talking about the judgment of Constitution Court of Indonesia Number 25/PUU-XIV/2016, it’s the judgment as an important thing in criminal law enforcement especially toward corruption. The origin of Its judgment come from judicial review toward Article 2 Section (1) and Article 3 Act Number 31 year 1999 juncto Act Number 20 year 2001 about Eradication Corruption Crime. Its judgment push the law official especially the investigator and the judge must be proof the state loss. A state loss must be actual loss, not merely in prediction of state loos or potential loss. This research using normative approach and touched by jurist empirical method, caused by analyzing the act / criminal law and comparing with the field practical of criminal justice system. The object of this research is District Attorney of Yogyakarta and Yogyakarta Special Court of Corruption. As law official, the investigator, the general prosecutor and the judge appreciate and obey the judgment, even the investigator, the general prosecutor and the judge appreciate and obey the judgment has been applied its judgment before it. In while on the The judgment of Constitution Court of Indonesia Number 25/PUU-XIV/2016 the judge consider that the case is not nebis in idem and also giving legal certainty, because a state loss must be actual.


Keywords


law applied;law enforcement;state loss;corruption

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andi Hamzah. Perbandingan Pemberantasan Korupsi di Berbagai Negara. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta. 2005. Hal 1 dalam Jawade Hafidz Arsyad. Korupsi Dalam Persepektif HAN (Hukum Administrasi Negara). Sinar Grafika. Jakarta. 2013.

Francis Fukuyama, TRUST: Kebajikan Sosial dan Penciptaan Kemakmuran, Penerbit Qalam, Jogjakarta,2007.

Harun M. Husen, Kejahatan dan Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia, Rineka Cipta,

Jakarta, 1990.

Jafar Sodik, “Reformasi Sistem Hukum Pidana Sebagai Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Kajian Hasil Penelitian Hukum, Vol. 3 (1), Mei 2019.

Jawade Hafidz Arsyad. Korupsi Dalam Persepektif HAN (Hukum Administrasi Negara). Sinar Grafika. Jakarta. 2013.

Satjipto Rahardjo. Ilmu Hukum; Pencarian, Pembebasan dan Pencerahan. Muhammadiyah Press University. Surakarta. 2004.

Satjipto Rahardjo, Membedah Hukum Progresif, Kompas. Jakarta, 2007.

Satjipto Rahardjo, Penegakan Hukum Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta, 2009.

Soerjono Soekanto, Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, UI Pres, Jakarta, 1983.

Sutanto, Yanto, dan Sigit Setyadi, “Kajian Terhadap Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Saluran Ultra Tegangan Ekstra Tinggi (Sutet) Di Bawah Ancaman Minimum Khusus (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Negeri Wates-Kulon Progo)”, Kajian Hasil Penelitian Hukum, Vol. 3 (1), Mei 2019

Andhika Prasetia detik News. Jaksa Agung; Putusan MK Jadikan Pidana Korupsi Delik Materill. Detiknews. Jakarta. 2017. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3410935/jaksa-agung-putusan-mk-jadikan-pidana-korupsi-delik-materiil diakses pada tanggal 13 Mei 2019.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Kajian Hasil Penelitian Hukum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats