Konsistensi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Memutus Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar

Sirajul Munir

Abstract


Constitutional court is a man/actors/ for power of judgement has function as guardian of the constitution through judicial review. Contitunal court has valued as each of dreams for controlled of core judge to gave justice assurance, publical order and purposegoal of country. Although, several cases of judicial review which decision by constitunal court showed not sure or consistent of law in the constitunal court position between positive or negative legislature department. In the research, used judicial normative method, it’s kind of research methods did which to collected and read of literature from books, law regulations , judgement by the judge and data accorded to the theme. Considerant of decision judicial review’s constitunal court showed to available on two positions. The negative legislature considerant dominant to obedience and certain of law one releate with separation of powers. However, the positive legislator considerant dominant to deep on justice values into public one able give good effect and fill in hole of law.Certain conditions, constitunal court input norm of law into decision although other condition available on not agreement with reason the legality just had by legislative. Well, constitunal court choose about standart or identify of time make positive legislature decision so important.

Keywords : Decision, Constitunal Court, Judicial Review

 


Keywords


Decision, Constitunal Court, Judicial Review

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

References


Buku :

Abdul Latif, 2009. FungsiMahkamah Konstitusi Upaya Dalam Mewujudkan Negara Hukum Demokratis, CV. Kreasi Total Media, Yogyakarta.

Didik Sukriono, 2013, Hukum, Konstitusi dan Konsep Otonomi, Setra Press, Malang.

Hans Kelsen, 2010, Teori Hukum Murni Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum Normatif, Edisi Ke VII, Diterjemahkan oleh Raisul Muttaqin, Nusa Media Bandung.

H. L.A. Hart, 2011, Konsep Hukum, diterjemahkan oleh M. Khozim, Nusa Media, Bandung.

I. Jeremy Bentham, 2013, Teori Perundang-Undangan: Prinsip-Prinsip, Hukum Perdata dan Hukm Pidana, diterjemahkan oleh Derta Sri Wulandari, Nusa Media, Bandung.

Muhammad Syukri Albani Nasution, 2016, Hukum dalam Pendekatan Filsafat, Kencana, Jakarta.

Munafrizal Manan, 2012, Penemuan Hukum oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi, CV. Mandar Maju, Bandung.

Ni’matul Huda, 2010, Problematika Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah, FH UII Press, Yogyakarta.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2008, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta.

Peter Mahmud marzuki,2013,Penelitian Hukum, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.

Philippe Nonet dan Philip Selznick, 2013, Hukum Responsif, edisi ke VII, diterjemahkanoleh Raisul Muttaqien, Nusa Media, Bandung.

Soimin dan Mashuriyanto, 2013, Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia, UII Press, Yogyakarta.

Suteki,2013, Desain Hukum Diruang Sosial, Thafa Media, Bantul.

Ziko Ostaki, Francisca Romana Harjiyatni, dan Sri Handayani Retna Wardani, “Tinjauan Yuridis Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah Kota Yogyakarta Dengan Keputusan Gubernur Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta”, Kajian Hasil Penelitian Hukum, Vol. 2 (1), Mei 2018 :306- 332


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Kajian Hasil Penelitian Hukum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.