Kajian Yuridis Peranan Alat Bukti TerhadapPutusan Bebas dalam Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan (Studi Kasus Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Negeri YogyakartaNo. : 225/Pid.B/2016/PN.YYK)

Suparno Suparno, Yanto Yanto, JS. Murdomo

Abstract


This thesis study aims, to know and examine the role and strength of evidence against free decisions in criminal cases of letter forgery, and to find out what things make legal judgments for judges in making free decisions. This research is a descriptive normative legal research using secondary data types. In this study, the data collection technique used was library research. Then the data obtained isthen studied, classified, and further analyzed according to the objectives and problems and to further strengthen the data in this study, the authors also conducted field research with interview methods with Resource Persons. Based on this research the results obtained to determine the role and strength of evidence. facts at the trial, as well as judges' considerations in making free decisions against the accused. Besides that, the minimum requirements for two proofs and judges' convictions were also fulfilled, so that the defendant could give a free verdict. That the evidence and evidence is very important from the criminal justice process. The evidence has an important role, both starting from the investigation, investigations in the police, until the Public Prosecutor is forwarded as a basis for making charges and demands. And then the evidence becomes the basis of the Judge's judgment in displaying criminal case decisions, but the evidence is not enough if the convictions of the law enforcer will process the crime to continue, as if it were an important factor, both from the beginning by the investigator, by the Prosecutor The Public Prosecutor especially by the Panel of Judges to decide the case. If the evidence is not sufficient and or the judge's beliefs do not exist, then the crime cannot be forced to proceed to the trial process. Therefore, in this case the author took a case study of decision No. 225 / Pid.B / 2016 / PN YYK, in a case of fraud. And in the research of this case verdict, the panel of judges in its decision acquitted the defendant, because it was not proven and convinced the panel of judges.

 Keywords :Proof, Falsification, Free Decision


Keywords


Proof, Falsification, Free Decision

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

References


A. Buku – Buku :

Andi Hamzah, 2004,Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Cetakan kedua, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta

___________, 2015, Delik- delik Tertentu (speciale delicten) di dalam KUHP, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta

Karim Nasution, 1986, Masalah Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Proses Pidana, Jakarta Sinar Grafika

Marcus Priyo Gunarto dan Wahyu Sudrajat, 2018, Dekontruksi Putusan Bebas dan Putusan Lepas dari segala Tuntutan Hukum, Pustaka Pelajar Yogyakarta

Merina Kusumawati dan Sigit Setyadi, “Kajian Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Asal Usul Perkawinan”, Kajian Hasil Penelitian Hukum, Vol. 1 (2), November 2017 : 114-127, hlm. 120.

Mukti Fajar, yulianto Achmad, 2015, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris, Pustaka Pelajar Jogyakarta

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2013, Penelitian Hukum, Prenada Mediajakarta

Sudikno Mertokusumo, 2010, Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar, Cahaya Atma Pustaka Yogyakarta

Soerjono Soekanto, 2014, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Rajagrafindo Persada Jakarta

R Soesilo, 1996, Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal, Politeia, Bogor.

B. Perundang-Undangan :

Tim Harmoni, Buku Luks KUHP dan KUHAP, Harmoni Yogyakarta

Undang – Undang Dasar Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia (UUD NKRI ) 1945

Undang – Undang Nomor 13 tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban

Undang – Undang Nomor 44 tahun 2006 tentang Pemberian Konpensasi, Restitusi dan Bantuan kepada Saksi dan Korban

Peraturan Kapolri Nomor 9 Tahun 2010 Tentang Tata Cara dan Persyaratan Permintaan PemeriksaanTeknis Kriminalistik Tempat Kejadian PerkaradanLaboratoris Kriminalistik

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Yogyakarta, No. 225/Pid.B/2016/PN.YYK

YurisprudensiMahkamah Agung No. 876K/Pid/2006, No. 275K/Pid/1983

B. Internet :

LKHT FH UI, “Aspek Pembuktian”, http://www.lkhtnet.com, diakses pada tanggal 10 oktober 2018


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Kajian Hasil Penelitian Hukum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.