Analisis perlindungan hukum tindakan pencabutan konten secara Unilateral oleh Youtube berdasarkan Undang-undang Nomor 28 tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta

Andhika Justisia, Dyah Permata Budi Asri

Abstract


There are so many content creators that lost their video because of false claim using DMCA notice and takedown. When YouTube receive a report of copyright infringement using notice and takedown, YouTube must takedown that content video as soon as possible. There are three questions related to the problems. They are 1 How do the YouTube’s indicators related to copyright infringement look like reviewed using Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta 2 Are the content creators that lost their content video able to ask YouTube about the clarification of the copyright infringement 3 How is YouTube conduct reviewed using Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta. In order to answer those questions, the researcher used normative research as and secondary data sources. Then, the researcher explained the result of the research using qualitative descriptive. It showed that YouTube does not have copyright infringement indicators. When taking down a content video, YouTube is only using the description provided by the claimer. That conduct did not match the theory of legal certainty. For the content creators that lost their content videos can do an appeal by sending a counter notice and takedown and sending a restoration content request to YouTube. The opportunity that is given by YouTube to the content creators that lost their content was match with the theory of justice. Reviewed using Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta, YouTubes conduct is not violating any terms of that regulation.


Keywords


YouTube; Notice and Takedown; DMCA; Copyright; UUHC

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Ghofur Anshori, 2016, Filsafat Hukum, Cetakan Ketiga, Gajah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.

Google, 2019, Troubleshoot Video Takedowns, YouTube Help, support.google.com/YouTube.

Google, 2019, What is copyright?, YouTube Help, support.google.com.

James Loke Hale, 2018, Here’s How Scammer Abused YouTube’s Copyright Infringement System in an Attempt to Extort Money From Users, tubefilter, www.tubefilter.com.

Jeffrey Cobia, 2009, “The Digital Millennium Copyright Act Takedown Notice Procedure: Misuses, Abuses, and Shortcomings of the Process”, Minnesote Journal of Laws, Science & Technology, Volume 10, Issue 1, 2009.

Julia Alexander, 2019, YouTube Sues Alleged Copyright Troll Over Extortion of Multiple YouTubers, The Verge, www.theverge.com.

Kristofer Erickson and Martin Kretschmer, 2018, “”This Video Is Unavailable”: Analyzing Copyright Takedown of User-Generated Content of YouTube”, Journal of Intelectual Property, Information Technology, and Electronic Commerce Law, Volume 9, 2018.

Kurt Hunt, 2007, “Copyright and YouTube: Pirate’s Playground or Fair Use Forum?”, Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, volume 14.

Mukhtar, 2013, Metode penelitian Deskriptif Kualitatif, GP Press Group, Jakarta.

Riduan Syahrani, 1999, Rangkuman Intisari Ilmu Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Salman Aslam, 2019, YouTube by the Numbers: Stats, Demographics & Fun Facts, Omnicore, www.omnicore.com.

Satjipto Raharjo, 2000, Ilmu Hukum, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Shoshana Wodinsky, 2019, YouTube’s Copyright Strikes Have Become a Tool For Extortion. The Verge. www.theverge.com.

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, 2007, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Cetakan III, UI Press, Jakarta.

Sugiyono, 2015, Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mix Methods), Alfabeta, Bandung.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats