ANALYSIS OF NOTARY CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY IN RUNNING THEIR PROFESSION INDICATES AGAINST CRIMINAL LAW (Study on Decision Case Number 40 / Pid.B / 2016 / PN.Btl)

Adelsa Anggie Fawzia NP, Suryawan Raharjo

Abstract


The responsibility of the Notary is very large in providing legal certainty to the public, because the Notary is given the authority to make a means of proof in the form of an authentic deed to guarantee legal order and protection for interested parties and society as a whole. But in reality, there are notaries who make deeds of unlawful acts that can harm other people. One of them is the case that has been decided by the Bantul District Court Number 40 / Pid.B / 2016 / PN.Btl.

This type of research is juridical empirical. Data collection techniques through interviews and literature study. The data analysis technique used descriptive qualitative.

The results of the study concluded: First, the judicial process mechanism against the Notary must obtain approval from the local MKN. This is in accordance with Article 66 Article (1) of Law Number 2 of 2014, namely for the benefit of the judicial process, investigators, public prosecutors, or judges with the approval of the competent Regional Supervisory Council (MPD). Second, the basis for consideration used by judges to try Notaries who are involved in a criminal offense is Article 374 of the Criminal Code, which has the following elements: (a) Whoever; (b) Intentionally and illegally possessing property, wholly or partly belonging to another person, but which is in his control not because of a crime; and (c) What is done by a person whose control of property is due to a work relationship or because of his search or because I get paid for it. Third, the responsibility of a notary is attached to his position, unless it is proven that due to the intention of the Notary, so that the Notary is subject to criminal elements such as embezzlement by the person who controls the item because of his position, so the responsibility of the Notary is subjective or personal.


Keywords


Notary accountability, against criminal law

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

References


Andi Hamzah, 2008. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Barda Nawawi Arief, 2016. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, PT. Citra Aditya Bhakti, Bandung.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2012. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Balai Pustaka, Jakarta.

H. Zainuddin Ali, 2015. Metode Penelitian Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Hans Kelsen, 2017. General Theory Of law and State, Teori Umum Hukum dan Negara, Dasar-dasar Ilmu Hukum Normatif Sebagai Ilmu Hukum Deskriptif-Empirik, Penerjemah: Somardi, BEE Media Indonesia, Jakarta.

Irawan Arief Firmansyah, dan Sri Endah Wahyuningsih, 2017. Peran Notaris Sebagai Saksi Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana, Jurnal Akta, Vol. 4 No. 3 September 2017.

Kartini Siahaan, 2019. Kedudukan Hukum Akta Notaris Sebagai Alat Bukti Pada Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana, Recital Review, Vol. 1 No.2 Tahun 2019.

M. Syamsudin, 2017. Operasionalisasi Penelitian Hukum, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.

Nico, 2013. Tanggungjawab Notaris Selaku Pejabat Umum, Center For Documentation And Studies Of Bussiness Law (CDSBL), Yogyakarta.

P. A. F. Lamintang, C. Djisman Samosir, 2015. Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Sinar Baru, Bandung.

P. Joko Subagyo, 2016. Metode Penelitian dalam Teori dan Praktek¸ Cetakan Kelima, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Pengadilan Negeri Bantul, 2016. Putusan Nomor: 40/Pid.B/2016/PN.Btl.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2017. Penelitian Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta.

Pricilia Yuliana Kambey, 2013. Peran Notaris Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana, Lex et Societatis, Vol. I/No.2/Apr-Jun/2013.

Putu Vera Purnama Diana, 2017. Pertanggung Jawaban Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Berdasarkan Pemalsuan Surat Oleh Para Pihak, Acta Comitas (2017 ) 1.

Roeslan Saleh, 2010. Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Aksara Baru, Jakarta.

Romli Atmasasmita, 2000. Perbandingan Hukum Pidana, Mandar Maju, Bandung.

Rosa Agustina, 2013. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum, Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.

Salim HS dan Erlies Septiana Nurbani, 2014. Penerapan Teori hukum pada Penelitian Tesis dan Disertasi, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Sugiyono, 2010. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif, Alfabeta, Bandung.

Tan Thong Kie, 2010. Studi Notariat, Serba-serbi Praktek Notaris, Buku I, PT Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve, Jakarta.

Wignjosoebroto, S., 2012. Hukum Paradigma, Metode dan Dinamika Masalahnya, Huma, Jakarta.

Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)

Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata)

Undang Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 atas Perubahan Undang Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris.

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bantul Nomor 40/Pid.B/2016/PN.Btl.

Henny Hartati, 2018. Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Bagi Notaris Pelaku Penggelapan Pajak Jual Beli Tanah (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 300/Pid.B/2015/PN.Dps.). Tesis, Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Narotama, Surabaya.

Muhari Supa’at, 2018. Proses Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Mobil Di Polres Pati (Studi Kasus Nomor BP/05/VIII/2017/Reskrim), Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, Vol. 13. No. 1 Maret 2018 2018: 203-214.

Sonya Praminda Yona Mandela, 2018. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Terkait Penitipan Sertifikat Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB), Ringkasan Tesis, Program Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Andalas.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.37159/jmih.v5i1.1709

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Kajian Hasil Penelitian Hukum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats