PRISMATIC SOCIETY THEORY STUDY OF THE SOCIAL FUNCTION OF LAND RIGHTS IN INDONESIA
Abstract
Studies related to interests become an interesting study in the field of legal science, because law science itself makes interest as one of the objects of its study. Broadly speaking, interests are divided into two, namely personal interests and social interests. This interest can be attached to both moving objects and fixed objects (land).
Attachment of interests to fixed objects, especially land, it is not uncommon for conflicts of interest to occur because humans (people) as legal subjects, on the one hand, are guaranteed their personal / civil interests, but on the one hand, humans cannot be separated from the social life of society. This concrete conflict of interest case occurs when national development requires land owned by community members to carry out public interests. There is a tug of war between private interests and public interests which often results in land conflicts that have broad socio-economic aspects.
On the basis of the conflict of interest phenomenon, it becomes an interesting study from the perspective of legal science, especially legal theory, to be able to explain the meaning and implementation of the basic principle that "all rights to land have a social function" as stipulated in Article 6 of the UUPA. The meaning and implementation of self-interest which is social in nature is an interesting problem, especially in Indonesia, with the conditions of heterogeneous / plural socio-cultural values that can be studied inter-disciplinary and multi-perspective.
To answer this problem, a descriptive analytical research was conducted using legal theory analysis tools, especially the theory that discusses the dualism of interests and the implementation of interests in social life (Theory Of Prismatic Social). As a source of research material, library research methods are used and the results of the research will be analyzed descriptively qualitatively with legal theory analysis tools and doctrines as an effort to answer the question of the meaning and implementation of personal and social interests inherent in a land right.
The results of this research are expected to be useful for the development of science, especially law science and more specifically Land Law. In addition, this research is also expected to provide input in the efforts of making government policies related to land acquisition for development purposesKeywords
Full Text:
PDF (Indonesian)References
Adams, Ian, Ideologi Politik Mutakhir, Konsep, Ragam, Kritik dan Masa Depannya, Alih Bahasa Ali Moerzaman, Penerbit Qalam, Yogyakarta, 1993.
Ahmad Anwarudin, 2013, Subyek dalam Pandangan Dunia Posmodernisme, Jurnal Refkesi, Volume 13, No. 14, April 2013.
Bambang Sadono, Reformasi (Setengah Hati) Agraia, Media Indonesia, 17 Januari 2012 dalam Yanis Maladi, Reforma Agraria Berparadigma Pancasila dalam Penataan Kembali Politik Agraria Nasional, Mimbar Hukum, Volume 25 Nomor 1, Februari 2013.
Betrand Rusell, Sejarah Filsafat Barat: Dan Kaitannya Dengan Kondisi Sosio-Politik Dari Zaman Kuno Hingga Sekarang, Terjemahan Sigit Jatmiko dkk., Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2002.
Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J., Cultue and Organiations: Sofware of The Mind, Third Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2010.
Magnis, Suseno, Frans, Pemikiran Karl Marx, dari Sosialisme Utpis ke Perselisihan Revisionisme, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, 2001.
N. Stearns, Peter (Editor), Encyclopedia of Social History, Garland Publishing, Inc, New York and London, 1994.
Notonagoro, 1980, Pancasila Secara Ilmiah Populer, Pancuran Tujuh, Jakarta (dalam Sri Soeprapto, Aktualisasi Nilai-Nilai Filsafat Pancasila Notonagoro, Jurnal Filsafat, Agustus 1995, Fakultas Filsafat, UGM)
Notonagoro, 1992, hlm. 51 dalam Benhard Limbong, Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Pembangunan, Margaretha Pustaka, Jakarta, 2011.
Notonagoro, Beberapa hal Mengenai Falsafah Pancasila, Pancuran Tujuh, Jakarta, 1975 dalam Sri Soeprapto, Aktualisasi Nilai-Nilai Filsafat Pancasila Notonagoro, Jurnal Filsafat, Agustus 1995, Fakultas Filsafat UGM.
Notonagoro, Pancasila Secara Ilmiah Populer, Pancuran Tujuh, Jakarta, 1980.
Reno Wikandaru, dkk., Landasan Ontologi Sosialisme, Jurnal Filsafat, Vol. 26, No. 1, Februari 2016.
Reza A.A Wattimena, 2011, Slavoj Zizek tentang Manusia Sebagai Subjek Dialektis, Jurnal Orientasi Baru, Vol. 20 No. 1, April 2011.
Rubaie, Achmad, Hukum Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum, Banyumedia Publishing, Malang, 2007.
Soekarno, Filsafat Pancasila Menurut Bung Karno, Media Presindo, Yogyakarta, 2006.
Soerojo Wignjodipoero, Pengantar dan Asas-Asas Hukum Adat, Haji Mas Agung, Jakarta, 1990.
Tafsir, Ahmad, Filsafat Umum: Akal Dan Hati Sejak Thales Sampai Capra, PT Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung, 2012.
Tjipto Susana, Evaluasi Terhadap Asumsi Teoritis Induvidualisme dan Kolektivisme: Sebuah Studi Meta Analisis, Jurnal Psikologi, Volume 33, No. 1, 33-49, Fakultas Psikologi UGM.
Tocquefille, Alexis de, Democracy in America, New York: Vintage Books, 1945 dalam Eko Rujito DA, Kelangsungan dan Perubahan Induvidualisme Amerika: Kajian Tekstual Dan Konseptual terhadap Pidato Pelantikan Presiden Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Artikel.
Triana Rejekiningsih, Asas Fungsi Sosial Hak Atas Tanah Pada Negara Hukum (Suatu Tinjauan Teori, Yuridis dan Penerapannya di Indonesia), Yustisia, Vol. 5 No. 2, Mei-Agustus 2016, UNS.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.37159/jmih.v6i2.2281
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Kajian Hasil Penelitian Hukum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats