PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMEGANG HAK CIPTA BERDASARKAN UU NO 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA

As’ari Maarif, Hartanti Hartanti

Abstract


Criminal Verdict No. 353  Pid.Sus  2015  PN SMN is one of the decisions used as research material in this paper shows examples of cases of intellectual property infringement. The purpose of this study is to know and meganalisa: judges' consideration in deciding cases of intellectual property rights committed by defendants NW in criminal verdict. 353  Pid.Sus  2015  PN SMN,  the link between law violations committed by the defendant NW in criminal verdict. 353  Pid.Sus 2015  PN SMN and copyright infringement that is categorized as a form of crimeand solutions to the infringement of intellectual property rights as committed by the defendant NW. In this research approach, the authors use the juridical normative and juridical empirical approach. The research data consist of primary data and secondary data. Data collection techniques consist of library and field data collection. The location of the research is at the Sleman District Court. The resource persons in this study were judges at the Sleman District Court. Data analysis was done by qualitative descriptive analysis method. The results of the research indicate that  judges' consideration in deciding cases of intellectual property infringement committed by defendant NW in criminal verdict. 353 Pid.Sus  2015  PN SMN is the defendant NW who is the General Manager of The Jayakarta Hotel & Spa who has the main duty responsible for the operations of The Jayakarta Hotel & Spa has held and let the top 2014 World Cup in Brazil in hotel rooms and In the hotel restaurant, 2 the link between the law violations committed by the defendant NW in the criminal verdict. 353  Pid.Sus 2015 PN SMN and copyright infringement categorized as a form of crime based on Criminal Acts with no rights and  or without permission The creator or copyright holder violates the economic rights of the creator.

Keywords: intellectual property rights, copyright, broadcasting rights


Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

References


Buku:

Andi Hamzah, 2008. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. Rinneka Cipta, Jakarta.

Barda Nawawi Arief, 2005. Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana dalam Perspektif Kajian Perbandingan. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Barda Nawawi Arief, 2008. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Perkembagan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru, Kencana, Jakarta.

Barda Nawawi Arief, 2009. Perkembangan Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia. Badan Penerbit Undip, Semarang.

Burhan Ashofa, 2004. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Rinneka Cipta, Jakarta.

Chairul Huda, 2008. Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Tiada Pertanggungjawaban. Kencana, Jakarta.

Dayanto & Asma Karim, 2015. Peraturan Daerah Responsif: Fondasi Teoretik dan Pedoman Pembentukannya. Deepublish, Yogyakarta.

Dwi Rezki Sri Astarini, 2009. Penghapusan Merek Terdaftar. Alumni, Bandung.

Elsi Kartika Sari & Advendi Simangunsong, 2008. Hukum dalam Ekonomi. Grassindo, Jakarta.

Indra Rahmatulah, 2015. Aset Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Jaminan dalam Perbankan. Deepublish, Yogyakarta.

Laden Marpaung, 2006. Asas Teori Praktik Hukum Pidana. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Lilik Mulyadi, 2008. Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana: Persektif Teoretis dan Praktik. Alumni, Bandung.

Moeljatno, 2000. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. Rinneka Cipta, Jakarta.

Muhammad Djumhana & Djubaedillah R., 2003. Hak Milik Intelektual (Sejarah Teori dan Pratiknya di Indonesia). Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Muladi & Barda Nawawi Arief, 2005. Teori-teori Kebijakan Pidana. Alumni, Bandung.

Muladi, 2002. Lembaga Pidana Bersyarat. Alumni, Bandung.

Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya, 2005. Relevansi Hukum Pidana Adat dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Sudarto, 1981. Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Alumni, Bandung.

Sudarto, 1983. Hukum Pidana dan Perkembangan Masyarakat. Sinar Baru, Bandung.

Jurnal:

Nader Rahnama, 2011. “Prevention of Football Injuries”, Int J Prev Med. 2011 Jan-Mar; 2(1), 2011: 38-40.

Syafrinaldi, 2003. “Sejarah dan Teori Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual”. Al-Mawarid Edisi IX Tahun 2003.

Perundang-undangan:

Undang-undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentan Hak Cipta. Sekertaris Negara, Jakarta.

Undang-undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2004 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Sekretaris Negara, Jakarta.

Internet :

Gede Nadi Jaya, . 31 Mei 2016, ”Gelar Nonton Bareng PD 2014 ilegal, 7 Hotel di Bali Digugat”. Merdeka.com, https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/gelar-nonton-bareng-pd-2014-ilegal-7-hotel-di-bali-digugat.htm.

Vim, 20 Agustus 2015. “GM Jayakarta Sebut Kasusnya Ranah Niaga”. 20 Agustus 2015. Tribun Yogyakarta, http://jogja.tribunnews.com/2015/08/20/gm-jayakarta-sebut-kasusnya-ranah-niaga




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.37159/jmih.v1i2.541

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Kajian Hasil Penelitian Hukum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

View My Stats